Wednesday evening is my new happy place. Why? Because it’s Clojure study group time! After Berlin’s first ClojureBridge, two off-shoot project groups were formed: an art group, focusing on libraries like Quil and Overtone, and a web development group. I am part of the latter.
Usually when faced with programming tasks like these, I have some idea how or where to start. It might not be the right or best solution, but it is something. And in my experience, having worked with or at some point studied Python, Java, C++, PHP, and Ruby, this something can carry across the different languages in some form or another: a
for-loop here, inheritance there, whatever.
Of course, with Clojure, it’s different. If I’m thinking about objects or
for-loops, I’m not thinking in a useful way. Rather I have to think about things like data structures and — surprise — functions. This conscious shift that I make in my thinking is similar to the shift my mind makes when I switch from speaking one natural language to another. If I try to speak French while thinking in English, I may use French words, but my expression remains awkwardly English.
Importantly, though, persevering so that we become able to make this shift — whether in relation to programming or natural language — will give us new ways of thinking about things. When faced with a programming task, we will be able to think about a functional solution in addition to a procedural or Object-Oriented one.
But I’d say that the best part about learning a new programming language, particularly one from an unfamiliar paradigm, is the novelty of it all. It’s like starting over, learning to code for the first time. When I wrote my first few lines of Python, it was like magic. Everything was new and exciting. A
for-loop, wow! How does it work? Nested
for-loops?! Amazing! It’s the same now with Clojure:
(map) what now?! Wizardry!